Website SEO comparison
Two pages side by side on the signals you can actually measure.
Free and no signup. This one fetches the URL from our server; nothing about it is stored.
This one runs from our server rather than your browser, so the address does leave your machine. Nothing about it is stored.
Mechanical signals only. Nothing here measures whether either page is worth linking to, which is what actually separates two sites in search.
About this tool
Comparing yourself to a competitor is useful for the mechanical things and misleading for everything else. This shows the seventeen signals that can be measured from one fetch of each page. None of them explains why one page outranks another — that is usually who links to it — but a table of them tells you quickly whether you are losing on something you could simply fix.
- Both pages are fetched at the same moment, so the speed figures are at least comparable to each other even though neither is a lab measurement.
- Response time is measured from our server. Treat it as a rough figure, not a Core Web Vitals result.
- The signals here are hygiene. If both pages pass everything and one still outranks the other, the difference is content and links, and no checker will show you that.
- Each page is fetched once, so comparing two costs two requests.
Questions
- Why does my competitor outrank me when this looks even?
- Almost always links and content depth, neither of which is measurable from one page fetch. This table rules out the mechanical explanations so you stop looking for one.
- Is a smaller page always better?
- Not in itself. Page weight matters through load time, and a heavier page that loads fast on a real connection beats a light one served slowly.
- Can I compare more than two pages?
- Two at a time. Beyond that the table stops being readable, which defeats the point of putting them side by side.